Forum menu |
|
|
| |
Reklame |
|
|
| |
Ansvar |
Tweakup tager intet ansvar ved
skader forvoldt på hardware ved brug af en driver eller fil
fra vores sektioner.
TweakUp tager intet ansvar ved skader på hardware ved brug
af guider og artikler på vores sektioner.
Husk tweak og overclocking af computer sker på helt eget
ansvar.
|
|
| |
|
|
Sandforce SF-1200 3 way benchmark. |
|
Techreport har 3 af de nye ssd diske sadt op mod hinanden og en håndfuld andre diske,og for dem der har hidset sig op på de modeller er der faktisk en overaskelse af den mere trælse slags. |
Fra: techreport.com
With the right workload, SandForce's SF-1200 storage controller has enormous potential. All three of the SF-1200-based drives we tested offer solid sequential throughput and very fast random access times across a range of transfer sizes. The SF-1200 proved particularly adept at handling random writes with larger transfer sizes, and it absolutely crushed the field when fed IOMeter workloads that contained a mix of read and write operations. Throw in quick load times and a strong showing in our multitasking tests, and all the hype surrounding SandForce looks very much deserved.
That said, the SF-1200 isn't well optimized for all situations. As our FC-Test file creation and copy results illustrate, the controller's sequential write speed appears to be much more dependent on effective use of command queuing than other SSD architectures. Microsoft's Windows 7 AHCI drivers appear to make matters worse, as does a garbage-collection algorithm that doesn't reclaim erased flash pages as quickly as Indilinx- or Intel-based drives.
Link:Sandforce SF-1200 3 way benchmark.
|
Skrevet: 2010-05-18 22:42
Skrevet af: peiter
Kilde: techreport.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forumtråde |
|
|
| |
Poker |
|
|
| |
Facebook fan |
|
|
| |
Aktiv Bruger |
|
|
| |
Login. |
|
|
| |
Top tråde dag |
|
|
| |
Statistik |
|
|
| |
|
|
